- CAPABILITIES
- Public Policy Research & Analysis
- Messages from Jim Day
- Is There a Higher Education Bubble?
- Transparency Comes to the Private Student Loan Marketplace
- Why Does College Have to Cost So Much?
- What is Presidential?
- The Future of Student Lending (by Nathan Mueller)
- Educationomics
- Boys: Getting Through, Creating Appeal
- Provocations
- Managing the Wait List
- Tour de Finance
- Change We Can Believe In
- Top Takes on Our Private Client Summit
- Power to the Philosophy Majors
- Straight Talk on Student Loans
- FAQs about Alumni Research
- Graduation Rates and Retention
- Student-Loan-Backed-Auction Rate Securities Explained
- The Matrix of Market Pressures on Student Loans
- Like Wallpaper and Firewalls
- Comparative Alumni Research
- Financing Higher Education Today
- Retention Research
- Other Research
- Messages from Jim Day
- Comparative Alumni Research
- Operational Assessment
- Enrollment Optimization
- Financial Aid Optimization
- Net Price Calculators
- Finance Models
- Training, Development & Planning
- Executive Search and Interim Leadership
- Price & Positioning Research
- Public Policy Research & Analysis
- ABOUT THE FIRM
- Approach
- People
- President James H. Day
- Principal Nathan S. Mueller
- Principal Carol A. Stack
- Principal Ruth A. Vedvik
- Associate David Busse
- Associate Principal Seth Harris
- Associate Janice Jaeger
- Associate Herald Johnson
- Associate Lee Johnson
- Associate Kevin Menk
- Associate Jim Miller
- Analyst Nicole Stanich
- Statistician Todd Melander
- Statistician Stacie Toal
- Associate Principal Kimberly Johnson
- Of Counsel Jon McGee
- Employment
- CLIENTS
- NEWS & RESOURCES
- Finance & Policy News
- Events Calendar
- "HD" TV
- Family Finances Forecast
- Discussion: Interim Financial Aid Directors
- Managing Prospect Qualification and the Wait List
- The Effect of Good Athletics News on Enrollment
- What Boys Want
- What is the New Normal?
- Inside the Beltway: Change We Can Really Believe In?
- Crafting a Politically and Internationally Diverse Campus Community
- Educationonmics
- Enrollment Head as Chief Public Affairs Officer
- On Predicting the Future for Colleges and Families
- We Were Staring Into the Abyss...
- Other Research
- FUNDAMENTALS
- CONTACT
Comparative Alumni Research

“Private Colleges can't compete on inputs but we can compete on outputs.”
Kent John Chabotar
President, Guilford College
2009 Summer Seminar
Colleges increasingly compete in a market that does not perceive significant differences between small private liberal arts colleges, professionally-focused universities, and large, mainly public, research universities.
Indeed, the claims of public universities blur distinctions between themselves and smaller, private colleges and universities. It is now common for public flagship universities to promote honors programs, low student-to-faculty ratios, and a strong sense of campus community—even though these opportunities, to the extent they really exist, are limited to a select few.
For example, at least three Big Ten universities proclaim student faculty ratios of 10:1 or better. And while claiming these attributes to compete for better-prepared students, many large, public universities discount the value of attributes such as small classes, suggesting they make little difference in the quality of education.
Absent a clear sense of difference in institutional character or effectiveness, students and parents increasingly opt for subsidized public universities.
Private colleges, though they outnumber public institutions by a wide margin, enroll only about 15 percent of the undergraduate students in four-year institutions, down from nearly 50 percent as the 1960s began.
Perhaps it is not surprising then that U.S. News & World Report and other purportedly objective rating sources have become more influential. Widely disparaged by higher education leaders, these ratings become more influential with each passing year.
Criticized for their emphasis on inputs rather than outcomes and for the heavy weighting of reputation, even the editors decry the “paucity of data on what happens to a college’s graduates after they leave their alma mater.”
Private colleges must work harder and be more willing to identify, document, and describe their comparative value and effectiveness.
Hardwick-Day has conducted alumni research for:
- Council of Independent Colleges
- The Women's College Coalition
- Annapolis Group
- National Catholic College Admissions Association
- Lutheran Education Council of North America
- Minnesota, Illinois, and Indiana private college consortia
In every survey, on every measure, year after year, private college alumni express greater satisfaction with their education experience than their public university peers.
Explore the data compiled on this website. Then, take the next step–to use this extensive data in your recruitment efforts.
Contact Jim Day.
