- CAPABILITIES
- Public Policy Research & Analysis
- Messages from Jim Day
- Is There a Higher Education Bubble?
- Transparency Comes to the Private Student Loan Marketplace
- Why Does College Have to Cost So Much?
- What is Presidential?
- The Future of Student Lending (by Nathan Mueller)
- Educationomics
- Boys: Getting Through, Creating Appeal
- Provocations
- Managing the Wait List
- Tour de Finance
- Change We Can Believe In
- Top Takes on Our Private Client Summit
- Power to the Philosophy Majors
- Straight Talk on Student Loans
- FAQs about Alumni Research
- Graduation Rates and Retention
- Student-Loan-Backed-Auction Rate Securities Explained
- The Matrix of Market Pressures on Student Loans
- Like Wallpaper and Firewalls
- Comparative Alumni Research
- Financing Higher Education Today
- Retention Research
- Other Research
- Messages from Jim Day
- Comparative Alumni Research
- Operational Assessment
- Enrollment Optimization
- Financial Aid Optimization
- Net Price Calculators
- Finance Models
- Training, Development & Planning
- Executive Search and Interim Leadership
- Price & Positioning Research
- Public Policy Research & Analysis
- ABOUT THE FIRM
- Approach
- People
- President James H. Day
- Principal Nathan S. Mueller
- Principal Carol A. Stack
- Principal Ruth A. Vedvik
- Associate David Busse
- Associate Principal Seth Harris
- Associate Janice Jaeger
- Associate Herald Johnson
- Associate Lee Johnson
- Associate Kevin Menk
- Associate Jim Miller
- Analyst Nicole Stanich
- Statistician Todd Melander
- Statistician Stacie Toal
- Associate Principal Kimberly Johnson
- Of Counsel Jon McGee
- CLIENTS
- NEWS & RESOURCES
- Finance & Policy News
- Events Calendar
- "HD" TV
- Family Finances Forecast
- Discussion: Interim Financial Aid Directors
- Managing Prospect Qualification and the Wait List
- The Economy, Regulation, and Accountability
- The Effect of Good Athletics News on Enrollment
- What Boys Want
- What is the New Normal?
- Inside the Beltway: Change We Can Really Believe In?
- Crafting a Politically and Internationally Diverse Campus Community
- Educationonmics
- Enrollment Head as Chief Public Affairs Officer
- On Predicting the Future for Colleges and Families
- We Were Staring Into the Abyss...
- Other Research
- FUNDAMENTALS
- CONTACT
Fundamentals
Dan Sullivan is President (1996-2009) Emeritus of St. Lawrence University, former Chair of the Board of Directors of the Association of American Colleges and Universities (AAC&U), current Chair of AAC&U’s Presidents’ Trust—100 AAC&U-member presidents who agree to be visible advocates for liberal education nationally—and a Senior Colleague in Ann Duffield and Colleagues, a small higher education consulting firm. He is also former president of Allegheny College (1986-96), and at Carleton College (1971-86) he was on the faculty, then also Dean of Academic Development and Planning, and then Vice President for Planning and Development.
Throughout his career, beginning way back at Carleton in the early 1970’s, he has been an advocate for and practitioner of research evidence-based planning—especially in the areas of admissions and financial aid, but also college or university-wide. Among his many early writings in this area is a 1983 College Board-published book with Larry Litten and David Brodigan, Applying Market Research in College Admissions, which shows the power of good market research in the development and execution of admissions recruitment strategy.
by Daniel Sullivan
The competition with publics is intense and difficult because families and prospective students believe, based only on sticker price differences, that all public institutions are always less expensive and that differences in the quality of students’ experiences at public and private institutions and in the learning outcomes for students are small or non-existent. I think the time has come to put some facts out there for the public to see, and for independent college and university enrollment leaders to contemplate.
by Daniel Sullivan
Experience has shown over and over that thriving in the extraordinarily competitive environment of American higher education today requires thorough, on-going evidence-based benchmarking of a college’s educational outcomes and market success against its real competitors. The only way to succeed year-in and year-out in enrollment management is to know thy competitors and especially, without rose-colored glasses on, to know thyself. Far too few institutions do this well enough.
by Jon McGee
For higher education, 2011 seemed a year of paradox. On the one hand, we continued on the downslope of demographic decline. On the other, demand at many, perhaps most, institutions reached record highs. Economically, net tuition revenue rose at colleges and universities across the country in spite of the fact that family incomes continued to lose ground. Socially, American higher education continued as a model for the world, yet at home the chorus of critique and criticism about underperformance grew louder and fiercer.




